On the key performance indicator of ‘fighting corruption and holding people accountable’, Ramaphosa has scored significantly with last week’s developments. Read more in JP Landman's latest review.
|This political research note was prepared by JP Landman in his personal capacity. Landman is an independent political and economic analyst. The opinions expressed in this article are his own and do not reflect the views of the Nedbank Group.|
By JP Landman – Political Analyst
10 May 2021
In the corruption update last August, I wrote: ‘One must distinguish between what the state is doing and what the ANC is doing or not doing. President Ramaphosa has clearly put the state on a new trajectory. It is important that the ANC now follows suit.’ Nine months later, in the past week, this is exactly what happened.
Ace Magashule was suspended pending the outcome of his corruption court case in the Free State, and removed from a National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting. Former minister of State Security Bongani Bongo was also expelled from the NEC due to corruption charges. Magashule dominated the news. He may not have been the most corrupt person around, but he is the highest-ranking ANC official to be charged so far and, sadly for him, he has become the symbol of corruption in the ANC, together with Jacob Zuma.
Below the high-profile headlines, however, it is important to note that law enforcement agencies have identified an additional 68 ANC members from eight provinces who are being charged with a range of criminal offences.The charges include fraud and corruption (by far the most), murder, theft, stock theft, avoiding VAT, paying a bribe, sexual assault and rape, two drunk-driving charges, and one person in possession of dagga (but also subverting justice – probably the more serious offence). Including Magashule and Bongo this makes it 70 ANC members who must step aside.
Only the Free State ANC has failed to compile and submit to Luthuli House a list of individuals being charged. This was because the provincial structure collapsed after an Appeal Court decision that the last internal ANC elections in the province were null and void. Given the asbestos and looming Estina Dairy cases, the province will probably push the number to over 80.
This is the culmination of a party process that started in August 2020 when Ramaphosa wrote his famous open letter in which he said: ‘Today, the ANC and its leaders stand accused of corruption. The ANC may not stand alone in the dock, but it does stand as Accused no 1.’ It has taken nine months, but the ANC has shifted to where it is now. There were very high expectations back in 2020 that this would happen ‘before Christmas’, or ‘before the 8 January statement’. But slowly and systematically the process was managed to where it is now.
The drive against corruption started in the state in 2018 when Ramaphosa became president; now three years later, the party has followed suit. The era of blatant impunity may not be over, but corrective action has certainly been taken and people are being held accountable. As Churchill said: ‘It is not the end, it is not even the beginning of the end, but it is maybe the end of the beginning.’
The 70 individuals from the eight provinces include the secretary-general, a member of parliament, several members of provincial legislatures, three members of provincial executives (provincial ministers), around 40 councillors or mayors and some 15 ‘ordinary’ members of the ANC.
The highest number is in KwaZulu-Natal (24) and the lowest is in the Northern Cape (one). One wonders if the 15-year prison sentences that former Northern Cape ANC leader John Block and his private-sector counterparty are currently serving for corruption has anything to do with the low number in the province. But it is also a sparsely populated province; and the current premier is a formidable no-nonsense guy. Proportional to ANC members in the province, the highest number is found in the Western Cape (11). In Gauteng, four people have been suspended from the party - some for Covid-19 personal protective equipment shenanigans – although formal charges have not been laid against all of them. It appears Gauteng is more willing to bite the pre-emptive bullet.
The Magashule/radical economic transformation (RET) grouping in the ANC has no doubt taken a severe beating. Three years ago, in February 2018, Magashule said, ‘members must just be patient, in five years we will take the ANC back’. It is not looking like that now.
Those who proclaimed ‘Ramaphosa is a one-term president only’ have clearly been repudiated. (The media outlet that proclaimed the probability of ‘President Magashule’ and wrote ‘In the real world, Ace is in the strongest position to wield the final, killing blow’ must surely qualify for some first prize.)
What the RET grouping will do now, will become clearer over the next few weeks. Their first option is to stay in the party and try to mobilise branches with an eye on the upcoming National General Council of the ANC (a conference of some 5 000 branch delegates convening to evaluate the party’s performance in government). That is what Zuma did after he was fired by Thabo Mbeki in 2005 and the Magashule/Zuma faction may try that again. Ramaphosa, however, made sure that he took the party structures along with him (unlike Mbeki). Also, the country is tired of corruption. And of course, the Ramaphosa people are not sitting still.
The other option is for the RET faction to leave the ANC and start a party of their own (or join other parties). This would be the cleanest and the easiest way and could unlock a reconfiguration of South African politics. But that may be a bridge too far, particularly regarding funding. We will see.
There are several branches in the ANC that are unhappy with the step-aside rulings and they will make a lot of noise in the coming weeks. However, the developments in the ANC Women’s League, where a proposal to suspend the step-aside rule was swept off the table due to members’ resistance, and the fact that not one provincial leader has expressed support for Magashule, indicate that the unhappiness can be contained. I expect the centre to hold.
The decision on Jacob Zuma’s contempt of court charge will also be a factor. It may have some galvanising effect, but it isn’t likely to upset the apple cart.
The suspension of Magashule also frees the president’s hand to do a cabinet reshuffle. I speculate that it will fit nicely into his ongoing plans to make government smaller, but he may not be ready to move on that yet. (He has already cut the cabinet from 34 to 28 members.)
|This communication is issued by Nedgroup Private Wealth (Pty) Limited and its subsidiaries (Nedbank Private Wealth) for information purposes only, and recipients should not rely on the information as advice without obtaining financial, tax or other professional advice. The information has been obtained from various sources and may include facts and events or prevailing market conditions at the time or date of the information going to print. Nedbank Private Wealth does not warrant the completeness or accuracy of any of the information and does not make any representation that the information is appropriate for use by investors in all jurisdictions. All opinions expressed and recommendations made are subject to change without notice. Nedbank Private Wealth and its employees may hold securities or financial instruments mentioned herein. The information in this document does not constitute an offer or solicitation of financial services or products and Nedbank Private Wealth accepts no liability for any loss or damage, including loss of profits or any type of financial or other pecuniary or direct or special indirect or consequential loss arising, whether in negligence or for breach of contract or other duty as a result of use or reliance on the information in this communication. Nedbank Private Wealth, an authorised financial services provider through Nedgroup Private Wealth Pty Ltd Reg No 1997/009637/07 (FSP828), registered credit provider through Nedbank Ltd Reg No 1951/000009/06 (NCRCP16), and member of JSE Ltd through Nedgroup Private Wealth Stockbrokers Pty Ltd Reg No 1996/015589/07 (NCRCP59).|
What do you think of the new site?